 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| Published on June 12, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Disclaimer and Forward Looking Statements | |||||||||||||||
| Company Profile | |||||||||||||||
| Organizational Profile | |||||||||||||||
| Name | Sherritt International Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| Describe nature of activities, brands, products and services |
Sherritt is a world leader in using hydrometallurgical processes to mine and refine nickel and cobalt – metals deemed critical for the energy transition. Sherritt’s Moa Joint Venture has a current estimated mine life of 25 years and has embarked on an expansion program focused on increasing annual mixed sulphide precipitate production by approximately 20% of contained nickel and cobalt. The Company’s Power division, through its ownership in Energas S.A., is the largest independent energy producer in Cuba with installed electrical generating capacity of 506 MW, representing approximately 10% of the national electrical generating capacity in Cuba. The Energas facilities are comprised of two combined cycle plants that produce low-cost electricity from one of the lowest carbon emitting sources of power in Cuba. Sherritt’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “S”. |
||||||||||||||
| Link to Corporate Website |
https://www.sherritt. com/English/Home/default.aspx |
||||||||||||||
| Industry Classification |
NAICS: 21 Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 22 Utilities 31-33 Manufacturing 54 Professional, scientific and technical services |
||||||||||||||
| Market Capitalization | $100 Million up to $1 Billion USD | ||||||||||||||
| Type of Operations | Primarily production oriented | ||||||||||||||
| Company Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | ||||||||||||||
| ESG Accountability | |||||||||||||||
| Role and Name of highest authority within company for Environment, Social and Governance strategy, programs and performance | Leon Binedell, CEO and President | ||||||||||||||
| GRI Reporting Requirements | |||||||||||||||
| Choose the statement as to how the organization has aligned their reporting utilizing GRI Standards |
Other, please specify |
||||||||||||||
|
This report has been prepared with reference to the GRI standards. |
|||||||||||||||
| ESG Reporting Period | |||||||||||||||
| Unless otherwise noted, all data contained in this report covers the following period | |||||||||||||||
| From | 2023-01-01 | ||||||||||||||
| To | 2023-12-31 | ||||||||||||||
| External Assurance | |||||||||||||||
| Has the report been externally assured | No | ||||||||||||||
| Geographic Scope of Report | |||||||||||||||
| Unless otherwise noted, the data in this report covers sustainability matters related to the following locations of operations |
• Canada • Cuba |
||||||||||||||
| Reporting Practice | |||||||||||||||
| If the organization has audited consolidated financial statements or financial information filed on public record, specify the differences between the list of entities included in its financial reporting and the list included in its sustainability reporting | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Provide the full contact details (name, title, address, email and/or phone number) for an individual responsible to address questions regarding the report or its contents | sustainability@sherritt.com | ||||||||||||||
| Currency | |||||||||||||||
| Unless otherwise noted, all financial figures referenced in this report are in the following currency | CAD | ||||||||||||||
| Membership of Associations | |||||||||||||||
| List of the industry associations, other membership associations, and national or international advocacy organizations in which the organisation participates in a significant role, as well as any economic, environmental, and social charters, principles, or other programmes that the organisation subscribes to or supports, such as the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), etc. | Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Sustainability Report. | ||||||||||||||
| Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations | |||||||||||||||
| Identify all of the entity's countries of operations that align with the World Bank's list of "Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations" | None | ||||||||||||||
| Finished Product for Sale | |||||||||||||||
| Identify the total amount of each finished product for sale | |||||||||||||||
| Fossil Fuel | |||||||||||||||
| Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) (tonne) | 8,434.923 | ||||||||||||||
| Metals | 31,548.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cobalt (Co) (tonne) | 2,876.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Nickel (Ni) (tonne) | 28,672.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | |||||||||||||||
| Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids (HGL) (cubic metres, m³) | 22,737.410 | ||||||||||||||
|
In 2023, in addition to the numbers reported above, the Fort Site location produced 219,707 tonnes of fertilizer for sale. |
|||||||||||||||
| Strategy | |||||||||||||||
| Provide a statement from the highest governance body or most senior executive of the organization (i.e., CEO, chair, or equivalent senior position) about the relevance of sustainable development to the organization and its strategy for contributing to sustainable development. (CEO's message for this report) | Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Sustainability Report. | ||||||||||||||
| Material Topics | |||||||||||||||
| Governance of Material Topics | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the process followed to determine the organization's material topics, including: | |||||||||||||||
| How did the organization identify the material topics | Materiality Assessment | ||||||||||||||
|
For a full disclosure of Sherritt's material topics please see Sherritt's 2023 Sustainability Report. |
|||||||||||||||
| Environment | |||||||||||||||
| Climate Change - Stewardship | |||||||||||||||
| Strategy | |||||||||||||||
| Have climate-related risks and opportunities influenced your organization’s strategy and/or financial planning | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Does your organization have a process for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Risk Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business |
No - risks exist, but none with potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on business |
||||||||||||||
|
Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Climate Report for more information on the climate-related risks identified to-date. |
|||||||||||||||
| Opportunity Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business | Yes | ||||||||||||||
|
Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Climate Report for more information on the climate-related risks and opportunities identified to-date. |
|||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the entity's absolute gross greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions generated during the reporting period, expressed as metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tonne CO₂-e) | |||||||||||||||
| Fuel related (CH₄) (tonne) | 0.054 | ||||||||||||||
| Fuel related (N₂O) (tonne) | 0.011 | ||||||||||||||
| Carbon dioxide (CO₂) (tonne CO₂-e) | 1,247,507.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Methane (CH₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 1.350 | ||||||||||||||
| Nitrous oxide (N₂O) (tonne CO₂-e) | 1,596,127.038 | ||||||||||||||
| Hydrofluorocarbon-23 (CHF₃) (tonne CO₂-e) | 3,389.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Hydrofluorocarbon-32 (CH₂F₂) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) (tonne CO₂-e) | 250,800.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro methane (CF₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro ethane (C₂F₆) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro butane (C₄F₁₀) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro hexane (C₆F₁₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 3,097,824.788 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 1 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
Net power generated in the Energas business increased from 6,745,700 GJ in 2022 to 7,503,021.400 GJ in 2023, representing a 31% increase. This resulted in an overall increase in Scope 1 emissions as gas turbines are the main source of power generation. |
||||||||||||||
| The entity may discuss the calculation methodology for its emissions disclosure, such as if data are from continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), engineering calculations, or mass balance calculations |
Scope 1 emissions are calculated by means of engineering calculations and mass balance calculations. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the entity's absolute gross greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions generated during the reporting period, expressed as metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tonne CO₂-e) | |||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 306,400.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 1 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
The Fort Site's 2023 Scope 1 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years. |
||||||||||||||
| The entity may discuss the calculation methodology for its emissions disclosure, such as if data are from continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), engineering calculations, or mass balance calculations |
Scope 1 emissions are calculated by means of internal metering, accounting records, supplier invoices, and engineering calculations. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the entity's absolute gross greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions generated during the reporting period, expressed as metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tonne CO₂-e) | |||||||||||||||
| Fuel related (CH₄) (tonne) | 19.252 | ||||||||||||||
| Fuel related (N₂O) (tonne) | 3.848 | ||||||||||||||
| Carbon dioxide (CO₂) (tonne CO₂-e) | 556,364.505 | ||||||||||||||
| Methane (CH₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 481.300 | ||||||||||||||
| Nitrous oxide (N₂O) (tonne CO₂-e) | 1,146.704 | ||||||||||||||
| Hydrofluorocarbon-23 (CHF₃) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Hydrofluorocarbon-32 (CH₂F₂) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Nitrogen trifluoride (NF₃) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro methane (CF₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro ethane (C₂F₆) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro butane (C₄F₁₀) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Perfluoro hexane (C₆F₁₄) (tonne CO₂-e) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 557,992.509 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 1 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
Moa Nickel's 2023 Scope 1 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years. |
||||||||||||||
| The entity may discuss the calculation methodology for its emissions disclosure, such as if data are from continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), engineering calculations, or mass balance calculations |
Scope 1 emissions are calculated by means of engineering calculations using fuel and raw material consumption. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 1 | |||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 3,962,217.297 | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Direct (Scope 1) GHG Emissions |
|||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 1 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
2023 Scope 1 emissions for the Metals business, which is inclusive of the Fort Site and Moa Nickel, remained within the historical range as there were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years. However, an increase in net power generation for the Energas business resulted in a subsequent increase in 2023 Scope 1 emissions for Sherritt. |
||||||||||||||
| The entity may, where relevant, provide a breakdown of its emissions per resource produced or business unit | |||||||||||||||
|
Sherritt discloses Scope 1 emissions on behalf of our JV partners. Accordingly, the total emissions attributed to Sherritt in this report, and other sustainability reports prepared by the Corporation, overrepresent Sherritt's specific Scope 1 emissions. The total of Scope 1 emissions that can be attributed to Sherritt are 50% for Moa Nickel and Fort Site combined, and 33% for the Energas business due to the level of ownership by Sherritt in each joint venture. Furthermore, any analysis conducted to assess the emission intensities of Sherritt’s businesses or product, should consider that the Sherritt’s Metals business is comprised of the Fort Site and Moa Nickel and the Energas business is comprised of various other sites. Production totals for each separate business should be used to calculate emission intensities. |
|||||||||||||||
| Discuss short-term, medium-term and long-term strategy or plan to manage its Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions | Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Climate Report. | ||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied energy (grid electricity) | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total electricity purchased from external suppliers for the reporting year in gigajoules (GJ) | 301,407.080 | ||||||||||||||
| In what jurisdiction is the source of energy (utility) located | Cuba | ||||||||||||||
| Conversion factor (see Guidance): | 0.800 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 66,979.405 | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied heat | No | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied steam | No | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied cooling | No | ||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 66,979.405 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 2 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
There is an increase in Scope 2 emissions reported between 2022 and 2023. This is due to a change in calculation method, including conversion factor used, that has resulted in increased data accuracy for Energas Scope 2 emissions data. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 2 | |||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 54,600.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 2 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
The Fort Site's 2023 Scope 2 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied energy (grid electricity) | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total electricity purchased from external suppliers for the reporting year in gigajoules (GJ) | 251,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| In what jurisdiction is the source of energy (utility) located | Cuba | ||||||||||||||
| Conversion factor (see Guidance): | 0.800 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 55,777.822 | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied heat | No | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied steam | No | ||||||||||||||
| Does the company purchase externally supplied cooling | No | ||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 55,777.822 | ||||||||||||||
| Discuss any change in its Scope 2 emissions from the previous reporting period, including whether the change was due to emissions reductions, divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output, and/or changes in calculation methodology (i.e. any changes the entity made to the measurement approach, inputs and assumptions during the reporting period and the reasons for those changes, if any) |
Moa Nickel's 2023 Scope 2 emissions remained within historical range. There were no material changes in activities or operations from previous years. |
||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Scope 2 | |||||||||||||||
| The total amount of gross global Scope 2 GHG emissions (CO₂-e) (tonne) | 177,357.227 | ||||||||||||||
|
Sherritt discloses GHG emissions on behalf of our JV partners. Accordingly, the total emissions attributed to Sherritt in this report, and other sustainability reports prepared by the Corporation, overrepresent Sherritt's true Scope 2 emissions. The total of Scope 2 emissions that can be attributed to Sherritt are 50% for Moa Nickel and Fort Site combined, and 33% for the Energas business due to the level of ownership by Sherritt in each joint venture. Furthermore, any analysis conducted to assess the emission intensities of Sherritt’s businesses or product, should consider that the Sherritt’s Metals business is comprised of the Fort Site and Moa Nickel and the Energas business is comprised of various other sites. Production totals for each separate business should be used to calculate emission intensities. Data Table - Energy Indirect (Scope 2) GHG Emissions |
|||||||||||||||
| Discuss long-term and short-term strategy or plan to manage Scope 2 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance against those targets | Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Climate Report. | ||||||||||||||
| Carbon Offset | |||||||||||||||
| Credits | |||||||||||||||
| How much CO₂ (metric tonnes) offset credits were purchased? | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Reduction of GHG emissions | |||||||||||||||
| GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives (in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Sherritt is currently in the process of developing a detailed emissions reduction roadmap for all of its major operating facilities and assets, which will ensure a comprehensive approach to meeting emission reduction targets. At present, there are no GHG reductions to report that are a direct result of reduction or abatement initiatives. |
|||||||||||||||
| Air Emissions - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Report emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of carbon monoxide, reported as CO (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reported as NOx (tonne) | 5,356.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of sulphur (SOx), reported as SOx (tonne) | 38,678.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of Particulate Matter 10 micrometres or less in diameter (PM₁₀), reported as PM₁₀ (tonne) | |||||||||||||||
| Information unavailable. | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of lead and lead compounds, reported as Pb (tonne) | |||||||||||||||
| Information unavailable. | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of mercury and mercury compounds, reported as Hg (tonne) | |||||||||||||||
| Information unavailable. | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (tonne) | |||||||||||||||
| Information unavailable. | |||||||||||||||
| Air Emissions - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Report emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of carbon monoxide, reported as CO (tonne) | 191.292 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reported as NOx (tonne) | 1,159.209 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of sulphur (SOx), reported as SOx (tonne) | 86.944 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of Particulate Matter 10 micrometres or less in diameter (PM₁₀), reported as PM₁₀ (tonne) | 57.256 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of lead and lead compounds, reported as Pb (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of mercury and mercury compounds, reported as Hg (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (tonne) | 9.547 | ||||||||||||||
| Air Emissions - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Report emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of carbon monoxide, reported as CO (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reported as NOx (tonne) | 1,515.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of sulphur (SOx), reported as SOx (tonne) | 16,662.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of Particulate Matter 10 micrometres or less in diameter (PM₁₀), reported as PM₁₀ (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of lead and lead compounds, reported as Pb (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of mercury and mercury compounds, reported as Hg (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Air Emissions - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions Management | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the management approach regarding Emissions |
Sherritt is committed to tracking and managing our energy use and GHG emissions at each site. Sites are required, per Sherritt's Climate Change Standard to implement GHG emission management systems that meet various requirements in line with the Mining Association of Canada’s (MAC) Towards Sustainable Mining (TSM) Climate Change Protocol. Sherritt is currently in the process of developing a detailed emission reduction roadmap for all of its major operating facilities and assets that will ensure a comprehensive approach to meeting emissions reduction targets. At present GHG emissions have not reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives. |
||||||||||||||
| TSM Climate Change Protocol | |||||||||||||||
| Report emissions of air pollutants that are released into the atmosphere | |||||||||||||||
| Emissions of carbon monoxide, reported as CO (tonne) | 191.292 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), reported as NOx (tonne) | 8,030.209 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of oxides of sulphur (SOx), reported as SOx (tonne) | 55,426.944 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of Particulate Matter 10 micrometres or less in diameter (PM₁₀), reported as PM₁₀ (tonne) | 57.256 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of lead and lead compounds, reported as Pb (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of mercury and mercury compounds, reported as Hg (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Emissions of non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (tonne) | 9.547 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total air emissions reported for Energas, Fort Site and Moa Nickel are based on available information and/or on the applicability of the indicator to the operation. |
|||||||||||||||
| Energy - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumption within the organization | -7,503,021.400 | ||||||||||||||
|
In 2023, our Energas operations sold more energy than was consumed by the operations resulting in a negative total energy consumption value. |
|||||||||||||||
| Report the energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed in gigajoules for the following | 752,332.600 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 752,332.600 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Renewable fuel consumed (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report energy owned and controlled by the organization sold in gigajoules and report the totals for each | 8,255,354.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 8,255,354.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumption within the organization | 9,017,618.340 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed in gigajoules for the following | 9,081,690.700 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 599,465.990 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 690,445.670 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 3,582,240.430 | ||||||||||||||
| Renewable fuel consumed (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report energy owned and controlled by the organization sold in gigajoules and report the totals for each | 64,072.360 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 64,072.360 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumption within the organization | 9,101,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed in gigajoules for the following | 9,101,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 251,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 6,863,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 1,987,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Renewable fuel consumed (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report energy owned and controlled by the organization sold in gigajoules and report the totals for each | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumption within the organization | 10,615,596.940 | ||||||||||||||
|
The 2023 Sherritt total for energy consumption is smaller than the total of energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed. This is because, in 2023, our Energas operations sold more energy than was consumed by the operations resulting in a negative total energy consumption value. |
|||||||||||||||
| Report the energy owned and controlled by the organization consumed in gigajoules for the following | 18,935,023.300 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 1,602,798.590 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 7,553,445.670 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam purchased/generated for consumption (gigajoules, GJ) | 5,569,240.430 | ||||||||||||||
| Renewable fuel consumed (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report energy owned and controlled by the organization sold in gigajoules and report the totals for each | 8,319,426.360 | ||||||||||||||
| Electricity sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 8,255,354.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Heating sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Cooling sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Steam sold (gigajoules, GJ) | 64,072.360 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy Management - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumed in aggregate, in gigajoules (GJ) (hydrocarbons and electricity) including the fuel types used (e.g., biomass, hydro-electric power or bioenergy) | -7,503,021.400 | ||||||||||||||
|
In 2023, our Energas operations sold more energy than was consumed by the operations resulting in a negative total energy consumption value. |
|||||||||||||||
| Percentage energy consumed that was supplied by grid electricity | -10.0271% | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of energy consumed that is renewable energy (does not include purchased grid-mix) | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Energy Management - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumed in aggregate, in gigajoules (GJ) (hydrocarbons and electricity) including the fuel types used (e.g., biomass, hydro-electric power or bioenergy) | 9,017,618.340 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage energy consumed that was supplied by grid electricity | 6.6477% | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of energy consumed that is renewable energy (does not include purchased grid-mix) | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Energy Management - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumed in aggregate, in gigajoules (GJ) (hydrocarbons and electricity) including the fuel types used (e.g., biomass, hydro-electric power or bioenergy) | 9,101,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage energy consumed that was supplied by grid electricity | 2.7579% | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of energy consumed that is renewable energy (does not include purchased grid-mix) | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Energy Management - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Total energy consumed in aggregate, in gigajoules (GJ) (hydrocarbons and electricity) including the fuel types used (e.g., biomass, hydro-electric power or bioenergy) | 10,615,596.940 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage energy consumed that was supplied by grid electricity | 15.0985% | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of energy consumed that is renewable energy (does not include purchased grid-mix) | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Reuse and recycle | |||||||||||||||
| Total volume of water that has been used in an operational task and is recovered and used again in an operational task, either without treatment (reuse) or with treatment (recycle) (megalitres) | 3,333.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Reuse and recycle | |||||||||||||||
| Total volume of water that has been used in an operational task and is recovered and used again in an operational task, either without treatment (reuse) or with treatment (recycle) (megalitres) | 884.950 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Reuse and recycle | |||||||||||||||
| Total volume of water that has been used in an operational task and is recovered and used again in an operational task, either without treatment (reuse) or with treatment (recycle) (megalitres) | 4,906.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Reuse and recycle | |||||||||||||||
| Total volume of water that has been used in an operational task and is recovered and used again in an operational task, either without treatment (reuse) or with treatment (recycle) (megalitres) | 9,123.950 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the amount of freshwater water that was consumed in its operations (in thousands of cubic meters) | 25.109 | ||||||||||||||
|
An atypical increase in freshwater consumed was reported for Energas in 2022 due to a one- time requirement for aqueduct flooding at the Varadero site. In 2023 freshwater use returned to routine levels. |
|||||||||||||||
| Analyse and list all operations for water risks and identify activities that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct |
Does not apply. Operations do not interact with water bodies classified as being in High or Extremely High Water Stress locations as defined by the World Resources Institute's (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the freshwater withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose freshwater consumed in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the amount of freshwater water that was consumed in its operations (in thousands of cubic meters) | 2,351.918 | ||||||||||||||
| Analyse and list all operations for water risks and identify activities that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct |
In 2023, due to drought conditions in the region, the North Saskatchewan River was classified with High Water Stress. Raw water is withdrawn from the North Saskatchewan River by the Fort Site for various onsite uses, such as process water, cooling water, fire water, and boiler feed water. Water withdrawal by the Fort Site is permitted and within Licence parameters. Please note that this is a conservative calculation as the water stress designation for the North Saskatchewan River varies throughout the year and historical data is not provided by the WRI Water Risk Atlas tool. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the freshwater withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose water withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress (in thousands of cubic meters) | 2,351.918 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose freshwater consumed in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed | 58.2819% | ||||||||||||||
| Total water consumed in locations with high or extremely high baseline water stress (in thousands of cubic meters) | 1,370.742 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the amount of freshwater water that was consumed in its operations (in thousands of cubic meters) | 15,778.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Analyse and list all operations for water risks and identify activities that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct |
Does not apply. Operations do not interact with water bodies classified as being in High or Extremely High Water Stress locations as defined by the WRI Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the freshwater withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose freshwater consumed in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the amount of freshwater water that was consumed in its operations (in thousands of cubic meters) | 18,155.027 | ||||||||||||||
| Analyse and list all operations for water risks and identify activities that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s (WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct |
Does not apply for Energas and Moa Nickel operations. Both these operations do not interact with water bodies classified as being in High or Extremely High Water Stress locations as defined by the WRI Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct. In 2023, due to drought conditions in the region, the North Saskatchewan River was classified with High Water Stress. Raw water is withdrawn from the North Saskatchewan River by the Fort Site for various onsite uses, such as process water, cooling water, fire water, and boiler feed water. Water withdrawal by the Fort Site is permitted and within Licence parameters. Please note that this is a conservative calculation as the water stress designation for the North Saskatchewan River varies throughout the year and historical data is not provided by the WRI Water Risk Atlas tool. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the freshwater withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose freshwater consumed in locations with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed | 7.5502% | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Was your organization subject to any fines, enforcement orders, and/or other penalties for water-related regulatory violations | No | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations, including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quality-based standards (note: only those that resulted in a formal enforcement action(s)) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Was your organization subject to any fines, enforcement orders, and/or other penalties for water-related regulatory violations | No | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations, including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quality-based standards (note: only those that resulted in a formal enforcement action(s)) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Was your organization subject to any fines, enforcement orders, and/or other penalties for water-related regulatory violations | No | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations, including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quality-based standards (note: only those that resulted in a formal enforcement action(s)) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Water - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Water Management | |||||||||||||||
| Was your organization subject to any fines, enforcement orders, and/or other penalties for water-related regulatory violations | No | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations, including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quality-based standards (note: only those that resulted in a formal enforcement action(s)) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Interactions with Water As A Shared Resource | |||||||||||||||
| Describe how the organization interacts with water, including how and where water is withdrawn, consumed, and discharged, and the water-related impacts caused or contributed to, or directly linked to the organization’s activities, products or services by a business relationship (e.g., impacts caused by runoff) |
Sherritt's Water Management Standard requires all sites to implement a water monitoring program that addresses surface water and groundwater, in where both water quality and water quantity monitoring parameters have been informed by identified risks. The Standard dictates that sites are required to maintain records of facility-level water quality and quantity data and to conduct regular trend analyses to inform iterative water management decision making processes. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe the approach used to identify water-related impacts, including the scope of assessments, their timeframe, and any tools or methodologies used |
Sherritt’s Water Management Standard requires sites to identify and assess facility- level risks related to surface water and groundwater. Sites are required to establish water performance objectives that include controls, response and contingency plans, and monitoring for the relevant water risks. Where relevant, sites are required to identify and engage with relevant water-related stakeholders to better understand how they use water resources, including water-related local practices, beliefs, customs and traditional knowledge in the case that water-related impacts arise. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe how water-related impacts are addressed, including how the organization works with stakeholders to steward water as a shared resource, and how it engages with suppliers or customers with significant water-related impacts |
Water management at each of our sites is informed by site specific requirements and the application of overarching principles contained within Sherritt's Water Management Standard. At all sites, water management is a cooperative effort between Sherritt and the appropriate regulatory agencies. |
||||||||||||||
| Explain the process for setting any water-related goals and targets that are part of the organization’s management approach, and how they relate to public policy and the local context of each area with water stress |
Sherritt has established public targets related to water recycling objectives as part of our current 5-year Sustainability Goals. These targets were selected based on the water risk profile of the sites (moderate to low risk), and operational optimization opportunities. |
||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Water Withdrawal by Segment | |||||||||||||||
| Total water withdrawn by segment, in megalitres (ML) | 3,329.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 66.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 6.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 60.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 3,106.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Produced water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Third-party water (total in ML) | 157.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 157.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report on the total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megalitres (ML), and a breakdown of this total by the following sources | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Water Withdrawal by Segment | |||||||||||||||
| Total water withdrawn by segment, in megalitres (ML) | 2,367.116 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 15.199 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 15.199 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Produced water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Third-party water (total in ML) | 119.104 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 119.104 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report on the total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megalitres (ML), and a breakdown of this total by the following sources | 2,247.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 15.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 15.199 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Water Withdrawal by Segment | |||||||||||||||
| Total water withdrawn by segment, in megalitres (ML) | 16,026.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 15,778.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 15,778.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Produced water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Third-party water (total in ML) | 248.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 248.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report on the total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megalitres (ML), and a breakdown of this total by the following sources | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Water Withdrawal by Segment | |||||||||||||||
| Total water withdrawn by segment, in megalitres (ML) | 21,722.316 | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Water Withdrawal By Source |
|||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 18,010.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 18,010.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 81.399 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 6.200 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 75.199 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 3,106.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Produced water (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Third-party water (total in ML) | 524.104 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 524.104 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report on the total water withdrawal from all areas with water stress in megalitres (ML), and a breakdown of this total by the following sources | 2,247.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water (total in ML) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 2,232.813 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater (total in ML) | 15.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 15.199 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater (total in ML) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Water Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas in megalitres | 25.109 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megalitres | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Water Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas in megalitres | 2,351.918 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megalitres | 1,370.742 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Water Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas in megalitres | 15,778.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megalitres | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Water Consumption | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas in megalitres | 18,155.027 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total water consumption from all areas with water stress in megalitres | 1,370.742 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Water Discharge | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water discharge to all areas (in megalitres) | 2,829.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater | 163.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 163.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater | 2,666.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Water Discharge | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water discharge to all areas (in megalitres) | 981.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water | 981.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 981.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Water Discharge | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water discharge to all areas (in megalitres) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Water and Effluents - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Water Discharge | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total water discharge to all areas (in megalitres) | 3,810.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Surface water | 981.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 981.175 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Groundwater | 163.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Freshwater (≤1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 163.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other water (>1,000 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids or TDS) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Seawater | 2,666.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generation and Significant Waste-Related Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total amounts of waste generated of the following and associated risks (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
There are no tailings facilities, and therefore no tailings-related waste produced, at any of the Energas sites. |
|||||||||||||||
| Overburden amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Rock amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Tailings amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generation and Significant Waste-Related Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total amounts of waste generated of the following and associated risks (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
There are no tailings facilities, and therefore no tailings-related waste produced, at the Fort Site. |
|||||||||||||||
| Overburden amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Rock amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Tailings amount (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generation and Significant Waste-Related Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total amounts of waste generated of the following and associated risks (tonne) | 5,175,239.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Overburden amount (tonne) | 2,122,728.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Rock amount (tonne) | 51,389.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Tailings amount (tonne) | 3,001,122.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generation and Significant Waste-Related Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the inputs, activities, and outputs that lead or could lead to significant actual and potential waste-related impacts |
Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Tailings Management Report. |
||||||||||||||
| Report the total amounts of waste generated of the following and associated risks (tonne) | 5,175,239.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Overburden amount (tonne) | 2,122,728.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Rock amount (tonne) | 51,389.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Tailings amount (tonne) | 3,001,122.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Total Amounts of Overburden, Rock and Tailings |
|||||||||||||||
| Waste - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generated | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste generated (tonne) | 674.090 | ||||||||||||||
| Organization's own activities (tonne) | 674.090 | ||||||||||||||
| Type of waste | |||||||||||||||
| Hazardous waste (tonne) | 85.490 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-Hazardous waste (tonne) | 588.600 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generated | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste generated (tonne) | 7,794.740 | ||||||||||||||
| Organization's own activities (tonne) | 7,794.740 | ||||||||||||||
| Type of waste | |||||||||||||||
| Hazardous waste (tonne) | 5,793.420 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-Hazardous waste (tonne) | 2,001.320 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generated | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste generated (tonne) | 1,811.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Organization's own activities (tonne) | 1,811.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Type of waste | |||||||||||||||
| Hazardous waste (tonne) | 1,397.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-Hazardous waste (tonne) | 414.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Generated | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste generated (tonne) | 10,279.830 | ||||||||||||||
| Organization's own activities (tonne) | 10,279.830 | ||||||||||||||
| Type of waste | |||||||||||||||
| Hazardous waste (tonne) | 7,275.910 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-Hazardous waste (tonne) | 3,003.920 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Diverted from Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (tonne) | 92.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 14.54 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 14.54 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 14.54 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 78.06 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 78.06 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 78.06 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Diverted from Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (tonne) | 3,119.59 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 2,841.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 2,841.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 2,841.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 277.67 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 277.67 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 277.67 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Diverted from Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (tonne) | 414 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 414 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 414 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 414 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Diverted from Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Total weight of waste diverted from disposal (tonne) | 3,626.19 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 2,856.46 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 2,856.46 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 2,856.46 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 769.73 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Preparation for reuse - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling (total, tonne) | 769.73 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Recycling - Offsite | 769.73 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Directed to Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste directed to disposal (tonne) | 574.66 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 36.46 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | |||||||||||||||
| Information unavailable. | |||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 36.46 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 31.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 538.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 538.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 538.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Directed to Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste directed to disposal (tonne) | 4,675.14 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 2,951.49 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonne) | 5.36 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 5.36 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 2,910.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 2,910.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 35.33 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 35.33 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 1,723.65 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 1,586.65 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 1,586.65 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Directed to Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste directed to disposal (tonne) | 1,397 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 1,397 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 1,397 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 1,397 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Waste Directed to Disposal | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of waste directed to disposal (tonne) | 6,646.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Total weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal (tonne), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 4,384.95 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonne) | 5.36 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 5.36 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 4,344.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 31.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 4,313 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 35.33 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 35.33 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal (tonnes), and a breakdown of this total by the following recovery operations | 2,261.85 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery), (tonne) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (with energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery), (tonnes) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Incineration (without energy recovery) - Offsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling (total, tonne) | 2,124.85 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Landfilling - Offsite | 2,124.85 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations (total, tonne) | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Onsite | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Other recovery operations - Offsite | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste Management - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total weight of tailings produced (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of waste rock generated (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of overburden removed (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste Management - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total weight of tailings produced (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of waste rock generated (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of overburden removed (tonne) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste Management - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total weight of tailings produced (tonne) | 3,001,122.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of waste rock generated (tonne) | 51,389.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of overburden removed (tonne) | 2,122,728.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Waste Management - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total weight of tailings produced (tonne) | 3,001,122.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of waste rock generated (tonne) | 51,389.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total amount of overburden removed (tonne) | 2,122,728.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Describe the policies and procedures that are set forth by the company's waste and hazardous materials management strategy |
Sherritt has developed several guidance documents to direct site-based employees on the management of waste including a Waste Management Process, Waste Process Manual, Hazardous Waste Manifest Procedure and an Annual Waste Report Procedure. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe how its policies and procedures compare with those required by local jurisdictions that apply to the entity |
Sherritt policies and procedures meet or exceed all applicable local, provincial or national waste regulations. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe how waste and hazardous materials management efforts are coordinated among business partners (e.g., contractors and subcontractors) |
Sherritt's Waste Management Standard requires sites to provide training to relevant employees and contractors in accordance with their roles and responsibilities. |
||||||||||||||
| Waste Management - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Tailings Storage Facilities Management | |||||||||||||||
| Does your company manage Tailings Storage Facilities | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Provide an inventory of all tailings storage facilities (TSFs) | |||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (1) Facility name | Acid Leach Tailings Facility | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (2) Location | Cuba | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (3) Ownership status | Moa Joint Venture | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (4) Operational status | Inactive/Care and Maintenance | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (5) Construction method | Upstream | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) | 53,700,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) | 53,700,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (8) Consequence classification | Extreme | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review | 2023-12-04 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #1: (12) Site-specific EPRP | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (1) Facility name | North Extension | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (2) Location | Cuba | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (3) Ownership status | Moa Joint Venture | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (4) Operational status | Operational | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (5) Construction method | Upstream | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) | 13,020,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) | 13,020,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (8) Consequence classification | Extreme | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review | 2023-12-06 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #2: (12) Site-specific EPRP | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (1) Facility name | Area 22 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (2) Location | Cuba | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (3) Ownership status | Moa Joint Venture | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (4) Operational status | Operational | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (5) Construction method | downstream | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (6) Maximum permitted storage capacity (tonnes) | 9,983,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (7) Current amount of tailings stored (tonnes) | 4,680,000.000 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (8) Consequence classification | Extreme | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (9) Date of most recent independent technical review | 2023-12-05 | ||||||||||||||
| TSF #3: (12) Site-specific EPRP | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Provide a summary of the tailings management systems used to monitor and maintain the structural integrity of tailings facilities and to minimize the risk of a catastrophic failure |
Piezometer readings, settlement monuments, pressure gauges, remote sensing, and other technologies are used to monitor tailings dams, abutments, natural slopes and water levels. For 2024 Moa Nickel is monitoring movement via satellite with the Engineer on Record. |
||||||||||||||
| Provide summary of tailings management systems and governance structure used to monitor and maintain the stability of tailings storage facilities |
The tailings management systems and governance structure used to monitor and maintain the stability of tailings storage facilities are summarized in Sherritt's 2023 Tailings Management Report. Each TSF is monitored regularly by the tailings management teams and Engineer of Record for safety and stability. Instrumentation such as piezometers and settlement monuments are reviewed as part of those assessments. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the approach to the development of Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) |
Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) are developed along with the Operations Maintenance and Surveillance (OMS) manual every two years or when a major facility change occurs. EPRPs are prepared by the Engineer on Record and the Tailings Dam Team. The initial draft is sent for peer revision and the final version is sent to Moa Nickel Directors and Sub-Directors for revision and commentaries. Finally, this document is sent to local authorities for approval. |
||||||||||||||
| Disclose the company's approach to engagement concerning Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) at tailings storage facilities, including the preparedness of local stakeholders |
EPRPs and the OMS are designed to account for the close proximity between the tailings facilities and the surrounding community of La Veguita. Two major safety campaigns are implemented annually to engage the local population and warn them of the potential risk of living near tailings facilities. Tailings dam personnel are also trained in these areas throughout the year and during their safety inductions and training. |
||||||||||||||
| Biodiversity - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Management Plan | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the approach to biodiversity management |
Sherritt is committed to identifying, managing, protecting, and conserving biodiversity. Our Biodiversity Management Standard is designed to meet all the Level A requirements of the TSM Biodiversity Conservation Management Protocol. To achieve implementation of our Biodiversity Management Standard, operating sites are required to develop a site level biodiversity action plan that assesses potential impacts or risks to biodiversity and identifies specific objectives or targets for significant biodiversity aspects. These biodiversity action plans include considerations such as local ecological knowledge, identification of any no-go or buffer zones near key areas, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Action plans are designed to address legal and corporate obligations (including those related to closure and post-closure) and align with existing regional initiatives, where possible. |
||||||||||||||
|
TSM Biodiversity Conservation Management Protocol |
|||||||||||||||
| Describe significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity in protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas |
Does not apply. Project footprints do not overlap with protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe the environmental and biodiversity management plan(s) implemented at active sites | Biodiversity Conservation Management Plan | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3 The underlying references for its plan(s), including whether they are codes, guidelines, standards, or regulations; whether they were developed by the entity, an industry organization, a third-party organization (e.g., a non-governmental organization, a governmental agency, or some combination of these groups) |
Mining Association of Canada - Towards Sustainable Mining: Biodiversity Conservation Management Protocol |
||||||||||||||
| Biodiversity - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Amount of land (owned or leased, and managed for production activities or extractive use) disturbed or rehabilitated (hectares) | |||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (A: opening balance) | 48.300 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly disturbed within the reporting period (B) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly rehabilitated within the reporting period to the agreed end use (C) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (D= A+B-C; closing balance) | 48.300 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cumulative land rehabilitated since the beginning of the operation (hectares) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Biodiversity - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Amount of land (owned or leased, and managed for production activities or extractive use) disturbed or rehabilitated (hectares) | |||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (A: opening balance) | 131.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly disturbed within the reporting period (B) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly rehabilitated within the reporting period to the agreed end use (C) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (D= A+B-C; closing balance) | 131.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cumulative land rehabilitated since the beginning of the operation (hectares) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Biodiversity - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Amount of land (owned or leased, and managed for production activities or extractive use) disturbed or rehabilitated (hectares) | |||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (A: opening balance) | 912.460 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly disturbed within the reporting period (B) | 51.130 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly rehabilitated within the reporting period to the agreed end use (C) | 40.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (D= A+B-C; closing balance) | 923.590 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cumulative land rehabilitated since the beginning of the operation (hectares) | 923.590 | ||||||||||||||
| Biodiversity - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Amount of land (owned or leased, and managed for production activities or extractive use) disturbed or rehabilitated (hectares) | |||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (A: opening balance) | 1,091.760 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly disturbed within the reporting period (B) | 51.130 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount of land newly rehabilitated within the reporting period to the agreed end use (C) | 40.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Amount of Land (Owned or Leased, and Managed for Production Activities or Extractive Use) Disturbed or Rehabilitated |
|||||||||||||||
| Total land disturbed and not yet rehabilitated (D= A+B-C; closing balance) | 1,102.890 | ||||||||||||||
| Total cumulative land rehabilitated since the beginning of the operation (hectares) | 923.590 | ||||||||||||||
| Social | |||||||||||||||
| Scale of the Organization - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees Information | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 62 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees | 43 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Female | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Male | 29 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Female | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Male | 18 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of male direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 47 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of female direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 15 | ||||||||||||||
| Workers Who are Not Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization | 418 | ||||||||||||||
|
The Cuban workforce is supplied by two state employment contractors. All contractors are under Sherritt and its partners' duty of care, but Cuban nationals are not hired directly by Sherritt. |
|||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Female | 44 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Male | 357 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Gender not disclosed | 17 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Total employed workforce (includes direct employees and workers who are not employees) | 480 | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed female workforce (includes direct female employees and female workers who are not employees) | 59 | ||||||||||||||
| Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 12.2917% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed male workforce (includes direct male employees and male workers who are not employees) | 404 | ||||||||||||||
| Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 84.1667% | ||||||||||||||
| Total workforce with gender not disclosed (include direct gender not disclosed employees and gender not disclosed workers who are not employees) | 17 | ||||||||||||||
| Workforce with gender not disclosed as percentage of total employed workforce | 3.5417% | ||||||||||||||
| Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce | 87.0833% | ||||||||||||||
| Scale of the Organization - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees Information | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 787 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees | 756 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Female | 161 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Male | 592 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Non-binary | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees | 31 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Female | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Male | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of male direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 614 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of female direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 170 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of non-binary direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Workers Who are Not Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization | 29 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Female | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Male | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Gender not disclosed | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Total employed workforce (includes direct employees and workers who are not employees) | 816 | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed female workforce (includes direct female employees and female workers who are not employees) | 172 | ||||||||||||||
| Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 21.0784% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed male workforce (includes direct male employees and male workers who are not employees) | 621 | ||||||||||||||
| Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 76.1029% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed non-binary workforce (includes direct non-binary employees and non-binary workers who are not employees) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-binary workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 0.3676% | ||||||||||||||
| Total workforce with gender not disclosed (include direct gender not disclosed employees and gender not disclosed workers who are not employees) | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| Workforce with gender not disclosed as percentage of total employed workforce | 2.4510% | ||||||||||||||
| Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce | 3.5539% | ||||||||||||||
| Scale of the Organization - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees Information | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Female | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Male | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Female | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Male | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of male direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of female direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Workers Who are Not Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization | 2,128 | ||||||||||||||
|
The Cuban workforce is supplied by two state employment contractors. All contractors are under Sherritt and its partners' duty of care, but Cuban nationals are not hired directly by Sherritt. |
|||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Female | 211 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Male | 1,917 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Total employed workforce (includes direct employees and workers who are not employees) | 2,135 | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed female workforce (includes direct female employees and female workers who are not employees) | 211 | ||||||||||||||
| Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 9.8829% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed male workforce (includes direct male employees and male workers who are not employees) | 1,924 | ||||||||||||||
| Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 90.1171% | ||||||||||||||
| Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce | 99.6721% | ||||||||||||||
| Scale of the Organization - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees Information | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 70 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees | 69 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Female | 41 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Male | 28 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Female | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Male | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of male direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 28 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of female direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 42 | ||||||||||||||
| Workers Who are Not Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization | 15 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Female | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Male | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Total employed workforce (includes direct employees and workers who are not employees) | 85 | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed female workforce (includes direct female employees and female workers who are not employees) | 45 | ||||||||||||||
| Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 52.9412% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed male workforce (includes direct male employees and male workers who are not employees) | 40 | ||||||||||||||
| Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 47.0588% | ||||||||||||||
| Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce | 17.6471% | ||||||||||||||
| Scale of the Organization - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees Information | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 926 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees | 870 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Female | 216 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Male | 651 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of permanent employees - Non-binary | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees | 56 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Female | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of temporary employees - Male | 45 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of male direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 696 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of female direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 227 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of non-binary direct employees (excludes workers who are not employees) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Workers Who are Not Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of workers who are not employees and whose work is controlled by the organization | 2,590 | ||||||||||||||
|
The Cuban workforce for Energas and Moa Nickel is supplied by two state employment contractors. All contractors are under Sherritt and its partners' duty of care, but Cuban nationals are not hired directly by Sherritt. |
|||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Female | 260 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of workers who are not employees - Male | 2,293 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Total employed female workforce (includes direct female employees and female workers who are not employees) | 487 | ||||||||||||||
| Female workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 13.8510% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed male workforce (includes direct male employees and male workers who are not employees) | 2,989 | ||||||||||||||
| Male workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 85.0114% | ||||||||||||||
| Total employed non-binary workforce (includes direct non-binary employees and non-binary workers who are not employees) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-binary workforce as percentage of total employed workforce | 0.0853% | ||||||||||||||
| Workers who are not employees (contractors) as percentage of total employed workforce | 73.6633% | ||||||||||||||
|
The Cuban workforce is supplied by two state employment contractors. All contractors are under Sherritt and its partners' duty of care, but Cuban nationals are not hired directly by Sherritt. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Gender Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Female direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Male direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| Involuntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Gender Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Female direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) | 34 | ||||||||||||||
| Male direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) | 75 | ||||||||||||||
| Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 109 | ||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) | 92 | ||||||||||||||
| Involuntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) | 17 | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Gender Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Female direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Male direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Involuntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Gender Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Female direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Male direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Involuntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Gender Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Female direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of females that left during the period) | 40 | ||||||||||||||
| Male direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number of males that left during the period) | 90 | ||||||||||||||
| Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of turnover for all Direct Employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 130 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of turnover - direct employees | 14.6644% | ||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left voluntarily during the period) | 108 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of voluntary turnover - direct employees | 12.1827% | ||||||||||||||
| Involuntary Turnover - direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left involuntarily during the period) | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of involuntary turnover - direct employees | 2.4817% | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Age Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations | Other, please specify | ||||||||||||||
|
All employees that are included on Sherritt's payroll. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Age Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 37 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 50 | ||||||||||||||
| Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations | Other, please specify | ||||||||||||||
|
All employees that are included on Sherritt's payroll. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Age Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations | Other, please specify | ||||||||||||||
|
All employees that are included on Sherritt's payroll. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Age Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations | Other, please specify | ||||||||||||||
|
All employees that are included on Sherritt's payroll. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Turnover & Age Breakdown | |||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 26 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 51 | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of turnover (the number that left during the period) | 53 | ||||||||||||||
| Identify types of employees captured in the turnover rate calculations | Other, please specify | ||||||||||||||
|
All employees that are included on Sherritt's payroll. |
|||||||||||||||
| Employment - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| New Hires and Rate of Hire | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of new direct employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | |||||||||||||||
| All direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period | 29 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of hire | 46.7742% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Female employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total female hires during the reporting period | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Females as percent of total new hires | 24.1379% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Male employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total males hires during the reporting period | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| Males as percent of total new hires | 75.8621% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires | 24.1379% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires | 48.2759% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires | 27.5862% | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| New Hires and Rate of Hire | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of new direct employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | |||||||||||||||
| All direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period | 144 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of hire | 18.2973% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Female employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total female hires during the reporting period | 56 | ||||||||||||||
| Females as percent of total new hires | 38.8889% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Male employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total males hires during the reporting period | 88 | ||||||||||||||
| Males as percent of total new hires | 61.1111% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) | 44 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires | 30.5556% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) | 73 | ||||||||||||||
| 30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires | 50.6944% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) | 27 | ||||||||||||||
| 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires | 18.7500% | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| New Hires and Rate of Hire | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of new direct employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | |||||||||||||||
| All direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of hire | 57.1429% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Female employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total female hires during the reporting period | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Females as percent of total new hires | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Male employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total males hires during the reporting period | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Males as percent of total new hires | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires | 25.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires | 50.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires | 25.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| New Hires and Rate of Hire | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of new direct employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | |||||||||||||||
| All direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period | 11 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of hire | 15.7143% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Female employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total female hires during the reporting period | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Females as percent of total new hires | 36.3636% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Male employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total males hires during the reporting period | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Males as percent of total new hires | 63.6364% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires | 27.2727% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires | 63.6364% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires | 9.0909% | ||||||||||||||
| Employment - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| New Hires and Rate of Hire | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number and rate of new direct employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender and region | |||||||||||||||
| All direct employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period | 188 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of hire | 20.3024% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Female employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total female hires during the reporting period | 67 | ||||||||||||||
| Females as percent of total new hires | 35.6383% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Male employees | |||||||||||||||
| Total males hires during the reporting period | 121 | ||||||||||||||
| Males as percent of total new hires | 64.3617% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged 30 years old and under | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30 yr. and under) | 55 | ||||||||||||||
| 30 yr. and under as percent of total new hires | 29.2553% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees aged between 30 and 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (30-50 yrs.) | 96 | ||||||||||||||
| 30-50 yrs. as percent of total new hires | 51.0638% | ||||||||||||||
| Direct Employees over 50 years old | |||||||||||||||
| Total hires during the reporting period (50+ yrs.) | 37 | ||||||||||||||
| 50+ yrs. as percent of total new hires | 19.6809% | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Collective Bargaining Agreements | |||||||||||||||
| Percentage of total direct employees covered by collective bargaining agreements | 39.0929% | ||||||||||||||
|
This number applies only to employees at the Fort Site as this is the only site that is unionized under Sherritt's direct supervision. All local Cuban nationals, identified as contractors in Sherritt's workforce, at Energas and Moa Nickel may be covered under a collective bargaining agreement or agreements, but these agreements are not facilitated by Sherritt. |
|||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the number of work stoppages of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total duration, in worker days idle, of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the number of work stoppages of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total duration, in worker days idle, of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the number of work stoppages of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total duration, in worker days idle, of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the number of work stoppages of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total duration, in worker days idle, of work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers lasting one full shift or longer | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Report total number of strikes and lock-outs exceeding one week | |||||||||||||||
| Number of lock-outs exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of strikes exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Report total number of strikes and lock-outs exceeding one week | |||||||||||||||
| Number of lock-outs exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of strikes exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Report total number of strikes and lock-outs exceeding one week | |||||||||||||||
| Number of lock-outs exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of strikes exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Report total number of strikes and lock-outs exceeding one week | |||||||||||||||
| Number of lock-outs exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of strikes exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Labour Relations - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Number of lock-outs exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of strikes exceeding one week | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Occupational Health and Safety - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Work-related Injuries | |||||||||||||||
| Injuries - For the total workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.231 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 865,747 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
|
The data in the section above represents all full-time equivalent employees at Energas excluding subcontractors. |
|||||||||||||||
| Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 1.224 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 490,204 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.408 | ||||||||||||||
| Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization): | |||||||||||||||
| Total Hours Worked | 1,355,951 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of all work-related injuries | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of work-related injuries | 0.590 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.147 | ||||||||||||||
|
Energas health and safety data values are inclusive of Sherritt's Oil and Gas divisional health and safety data. |
|||||||||||||||
| Occupational Health and Safety - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Work-related Injuries | |||||||||||||||
| Injuries - For the total workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.599 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 1,335,541 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.714 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 560,553 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization): | |||||||||||||||
| Total Hours Worked | 1,896,094 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of all work-related injuries | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of work-related injuries | 0.633 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Occupational Health and Safety - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Work-related Injuries | |||||||||||||||
| Injuries - For the total workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.045 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.318 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 4,406,601 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.363 | ||||||||||||||
|
The data in the section above represents all full-time equivalent employees at Moa Nickel excluding subcontractors. |
|||||||||||||||
| Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.100 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 2,006,199 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.100 | ||||||||||||||
| Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization): | |||||||||||||||
| Total Hours Worked | 6,412,800 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of all work-related injuries | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of work-related injuries | 0.281 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.281 | ||||||||||||||
| Occupational Health and Safety - Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| Work-related Injuries | |||||||||||||||
| Injuries - For the total workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 145,920 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization): | |||||||||||||||
| Total Hours Worked | 145,920 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of all work-related injuries | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of work-related injuries | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Occupational Health and Safety - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Work-related Injuries | |||||||||||||||
| Injuries - For the total workforce | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.030 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 12 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.355 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 6,753,809 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.237 | ||||||||||||||
|
The data in the section above represents all full-time equivalent employees excluding subcontractors. |
|||||||||||||||
| Injuries - workers who are not employees, but whose work and/or workplace is controlled by the organization | |||||||||||||||
| Number of fatalities as a result of work-related injury | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of fatalities resulting from work-related injury. Note: calculating per 200,000 hours worked | 0.065 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of high-consequence work-related injuries (excluding fatalities) | 0.000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of recordable work-related injuries | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of recordable work-related injuries | 0.327 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of hours worked | 3,056,956 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.131 | ||||||||||||||
| Combined (Employees and non-employees, but controlled by the organization): | |||||||||||||||
| Total Hours Worked | 9,810,765 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of all work-related injuries | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Rate of work-related injuries | 0.387 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Lost Time Injuries (LTIs) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) | 0.204 | ||||||||||||||
| Have rates been calculated based on 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours worked | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Child Labour - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Operations and Suppliers At Risk | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of: | |||||||||||||||
| Child labour | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Young workers exposed to hazardous work | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labour either in terms of: | |||||||||||||||
| Type of operation (i.e., manufacturing plant) and supplier | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Report measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labour |
In 2015, Cuba ratified the International Labour Organization's Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, which calls for the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour, including slavery, trafficking, the use of children in armed conflict, the use of a child for prostitution, pornography and illicit activities (such as drug trafficking) as well as hazardous work. Cuban legislation prohibits child labour and establishes 17 years old as the minimum age of employment. Sherritt has also established a Human Rights Policy that stipulates a strict prohibition of any use of child labour in its own operations or supply chain. |
||||||||||||||
| Child Labour - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Operations and Suppliers At Risk | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of: | |||||||||||||||
| Child labour | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Young workers exposed to hazardous work | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labour either in terms of: | |||||||||||||||
| Type of operation (i.e., manufacturing plant) and supplier | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Report measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labour |
In Canada, the use of child labour is controlled and prevented by labour laws. |
||||||||||||||
| Child Labour - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Operations and Suppliers At Risk | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of: | |||||||||||||||
| Child labour | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Young workers exposed to hazardous work | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labour either in terms of: | |||||||||||||||
| Type of operation (i.e., manufacturing plant) and supplier | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Report measures taken by the organization in the reporting period intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labour |
In 2015, Cuba ratified the International Labour Organization's Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, which calls for the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour, including slavery, trafficking, the use of children in armed conflict, the use of a child for prostitution, pornography and illicit activities (such as drug trafficking) as well as hazardous work. Cuban legislation prohibits child labour and establishes 17 years old as the minimum age of employment. Sherritt has also established a Human Rights Policy that stipulates a strict prohibition of any use of child labour in its own operations or supply chain. In 2023, a Conflict-Affected and High Risk Area assessment was completed and follow-up due diligence assessment at Moa Nickel. There is no child labour or other high risks in Sherritt's mineral supply chain. More information is available on Sherritt's Sustainability website. |
||||||||||||||
| Sherritt's Sustainability Website | |||||||||||||||
| Security, Human Rights and Rights of Indigenous People - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Discuss the practices and procedures while operating in areas of conflict, describing the approach according to the Five-Step Framework outlined in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas |
Sherritt does not operate in areas of conflict as per the World Bank's list of "Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations." |
||||||||||||||
| Human Rights Assessment - Other | |||||||||||||||
| Operations Reviews and Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Report the following for operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
These are corporate offices, Human Rights Impact Assessment requirements are not applicable. |
|||||||||||||||
| Total percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | Does Not Apply | ||||||||||||||
| Human Rights Assessment - Cuba | |||||||||||||||
| Operations Reviews and Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Report the following for operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Total percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 50.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Human Rights Assessment - Canada | |||||||||||||||
| Operations Reviews and Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Report the following for operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Total percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Human Rights Assessment - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Operations Reviews and Assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Report the following for operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
Of the three operations (the Fort Site, Moa Nickel and Energas), both the Fort Site and Moa Nickel have undergone annual (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023) Conflict Affected and High-Risk Area evaluations, which are based on the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process and grounded in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance. More information is available on Sherritt's Sustainability website. Sherritt's Sustainability Website |
|||||||||||||||
| Total percentage of operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or human rights impact assessments | 66.6667% | ||||||||||||||
| Local Communities - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Operations with Local Community | |||||||||||||||
| Have the operations included the use of the following | |||||||||||||||
| Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes | No | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Local community development programs based on local communities’ needs | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping | No | ||||||||||||||
| Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups | No | ||||||||||||||
| Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Formal local community grievance processes | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Number of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Description of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| The extent to which grievance mechanisms were used to resolve disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples, and the outcomes | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Local Communities - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Operations with Local Community | |||||||||||||||
| Have the operations included the use of the following | |||||||||||||||
| Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes | No | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments | No | ||||||||||||||
| Local community development programs based on local communities’ needs | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups | No | ||||||||||||||
| Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Formal local community grievance processes | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Number of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Description of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| The extent to which grievance mechanisms were used to resolve disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples, and the outcomes | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Local Communities - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Operations with Local Community | |||||||||||||||
| Have the operations included the use of the following | |||||||||||||||
| Social impact assessments, including gender impact assessments, based on participatory processes | No | ||||||||||||||
| Environmental impact assessments and ongoing monitoring | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Public disclosure of results of environmental and social impact assessments | No | ||||||||||||||
| Local community development programs based on local communities’ needs | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Stakeholder engagement plans based on stakeholder mapping | No | ||||||||||||||
| Broad based local community consultation committees and processes that include vulnerable groups | No | ||||||||||||||
| Works councils, occupational health and safety committees and other worker representation bodies to deal with impacts | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Formal local community grievance processes | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Number of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Description of significant disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| The extent to which grievance mechanisms were used to resolve disputes relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and indigenous peoples, and the outcomes | Does not apply. | ||||||||||||||
| Community Relations - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining | |||||||||||||||
| Number of company operating sites where artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) takes place on, or adjacent to, the site (not controlled by company/unauthorized) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of company operating sites where artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) takes place on, or adjacent to, the site | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Number and Percentage of Company Operating Sites where Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Takes Place On, or Adjacent To, the Site; the Associated Risks and the Action Taken to Manage and Mitigate These Risks |
|||||||||||||||
| Report the associated risks and the actions taken to manage and mitigate these risks |
Sherritt does not operate sites where artisanal and small-scale mining takes place on, or adjacent to the site. |
||||||||||||||
| Risks and Opportunities | |||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total number of site shutdowns or project delays due to non-technical factors | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Disclose the total aggregate duration (in days) of site shutdowns or project delays due to non-technical factors | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
No site shutdowns occurred due to non- technical factors during 2023 across the entire organization. |
|||||||||||||||
| Resettlement | |||||||||||||||
| Have there been community resettlements in order to accommodate business activities and if so, please provide the following details about the specific sites | No | ||||||||||||||
|
Data Table - Sites Where Resettlements Took Place, The Number of Households Resettled In Each, and How Their Livelihoods Were Affected In The Process |
|||||||||||||||
| Indirect Economic Impacts - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Infrastructure Investments and Services Supported | |||||||||||||||
| What is the extent of development of significant infrastructure investments and services supported |
In Cuba, Sherritt provided in-kind donations of municipal infrastructure equipment to local municipalities. Examples include irrigation systems to support local food production, road construction equipment, a submersible water pump to increase access to water for 10,000 people and the installation of solar panels to electrify a rural community. Local hospitals and care facilities were supported through the provision of appliances and equipment. Additionally, Sherritt provided the health care system in the municipality of Moa with a Hemodialysis Water Plant and heart surgery equipment. In Canada, Sherritt supported services including several Indigenous organizations, food banks, women's shelters, skills training for women, a children's hospital foundation, addiction outreach programs and many others. Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Sustainability Report for more information. |
||||||||||||||
| What is the current or expected positive impacts on communities and local economies |
Significant indirect economic impact, particularly through the indirect effects of employment, economic development, skills developments, and community benefits. In 2023, Sherritt invested >CAD$900,000 in local communities. 100% of community-based donations were intended to align with local community needs. |
||||||||||||||
| What are the types of investments |
• In-Cash (Commercial) • In-Kind |
||||||||||||||
| Indirect Economic Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Significant Indirect Economic Impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Provide examples of significant positive indirect economic impacts of the organization |
• Economic development in areas of high poverty (such as changes in the total number of dependents supported through the income of a single job) • Availability of products and services for those on low incomes (such as preferential pricing of pharmaceuticals, which contributes to a healthier population that can participate more fully in the economy, or pricing structures that exceed the economic capacity of those on low incomes) • Enhanced skills and knowledge in a professional community or in a geographic location (such as when shifts in an organization’ s needs attract additional skilled workers to an area, who, in turn, drive a local need for new learning institutions) • Number of jobs supported in the supply or distribution chain (such as the employment impacts on suppliers as a result of an organization’s growth or contraction) |
||||||||||||||
| Provide examples of significant negative indirect economic impacts of the organization | Not Applicable | ||||||||||||||
| Governance | |||||||||||||||
| Governance structure and composition | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the governance structure, including committees of the highest governance body (e.g. the Board of Directors, the Executives, the Board Environment Committee, Board Safety Committee, the Advisory Committee, etc.) |
Refer to Sherritt's 2023 Annual Information Form and 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
|
2023 Annual Information Form 2024 Management Information Circular |
|||||||||||||||
| List the committees of the highest governance body that are responsible for decision making and overseeing the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment and people (e.g. Board level Environment Committee, Safety Committee, ESG Committee, Advisory Committee, etc.) |
The Board of Directors and the Reserves, Operations and Capital Committee (ROC) and the Audit Committee of the Board. |
||||||||||||||
| Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | |||||||||||||||
| Describe whether the highest governance body has appointed any senior executives with responsibility for the management of organization’s impacts on the economy, environment and people (e.g., is it part of the Governance structure of the company, CEO's role, CFO's role, Sustanability Executive, etc.) |
The ROC Committee is the primary Board committee charged with setting and monitoring implementation of ESG priorities and approving policies and actions identified by the ESG sustainability steering committee and working group. The ROC committee has assigned accountability for the Sustainability Framework to the CEO, the COO, the CCO and the ESG Steering Group, which is comprised of all executives and heads of divisions. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe whether the highest governance body has delegated responsibility for the management of impacts to other employees |
The Board of Directors delegate this responsibility to the Sherritt Executive Team. |
||||||||||||||
| Policy commitments | |||||||||||||||
| Provide a description of the organization’s policy commitments for responsible business conduct |
Sherritt is committed to producing and supplying minerals that meet industry best practices for sustainability and human rights, and to advancing that commitment with its joint venture partners, subsidiaries, and their suppliers and customers. Sherritt’s Responsible Production and Supply Policy and Human Rights Policy identify our commitments, and our Mineral Supplier Code of Conduct identifies expectations for suppliers and due diligence processes to be followed to ensure any human rights risks in our mineral supply chain are identified and mitigated. Sherritt's corporate-wide Business Ethics Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy provide clear guidance to our workforce on what it means to act with integrity. These policies cover conflicts of interest, fraud and corruption, fair dealings, protection and proper use of the Corporation's assets, compliance with regulatory requirements, disclosure, confidentiality, and reporting mechanisms available to employees and contractors. |
||||||||||||||
| Governance structure and composition | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the composition of the highest governance body and its committees by: | |||||||||||||||
| Number of executive members (non-independent) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of non-executive members (non-independent) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of independent members | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Less than 3 years of tenure of members on the governance body | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| 3-6 years of tenure of members on the governance body | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| 6-9 years of tenure of members on the governance body | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| More than 10 years of tenure of members on the governance body | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of other significant positions and commitments held by each member, and the nature of the commitments |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Number of Male governance body members | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of Female governance body members | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Highest Governance Body | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the nomination and selection processes for the highest governance body and its committees |
The nomination and selection processes for the Sherritt Board of Directors and its committees are described in Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Do you have a diversity policy and if so, provide details, link to the policy or attach the file |
Sherritt established a publicly disclosed target of at least 30% women on its Board of Directors by 2022. The organization exceeded this target in 2021 by 13%. |
||||||||||||||
| Report the criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members | |||||||||||||||
| Discuss whether and how views of the stakeholders (including shareholders) are involved |
The criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members is described in Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Discuss whether and how diversity is considered |
The criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members is described in Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Discuss whether and how independence is considered |
The criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members is described in Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Discuss whether and how competencies relevant to the impacts of the organization are considered |
The criteria used for nominating and selecting highest governance body members is described in Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Chair of the highest governance body | |||||||||||||||
| Is the chair of the highest governance body also a senior executive in the organization (non-independent) | No | ||||||||||||||
| Conflicts of Interest | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the processes for the highest governance body to ensure that conflicts of interest are prevented and mitigated |
Sherritt's Business Ethics Policy and Anti- Corruption Policy provide clear guidance to our workforce on what it means to act with integrity. These policies cover conflicts of interest, fraud and corruption, fair dealings, protection and proper use of the Corporation's assets, compliance with regulatory requirements, disclosure, confidentiality, and reporting mechanisms available to employees and contractors. These policies are not available publicly but may be provided upon request. |
||||||||||||||
| Are conflicts of interest disclosed to stakeholders | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Are there conflicts of interest related to: cross-board membership | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Are there conflicts of interest related to: cross-shareholding with suppliers and other stakeholders | No | ||||||||||||||
| Are there conflicts of interest related to: existence of controlling shareholder | No | ||||||||||||||
| Are there conflicts of interest related to: related parties, their relationships, transactions, and outstanding balances | No | ||||||||||||||
| Collective knowledge of highest governance body | |||||||||||||||
| Report measures taken to advance the collective knowledge, skills and experience of the highest governance body on sustainable development. (e.g. board training) |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Evaluation of Highest Governance Body | |||||||||||||||
| Describe actions taken in response to the evaluations, including changes to the composition of the highest governance body and organizational practices |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Transparency | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the role of the highest governance body and of senior executives in developing, approving and updating the organization’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies and goals related to sustainable development |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the role of the highest governance body in overseeing the organization’s due diligence and other processes to identify and manage the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment and people |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe whether and how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support these processes | No | ||||||||||||||
|
In 2023, external stakeholder input on material topics was not sought, however this information may be gathered in future reporting years. |
|||||||||||||||
| Ethics | |||||||||||||||
| Ethics and Integrity | |||||||||||||||
| Describe how individuals can seek advice on implementing the organization’s policies and practices for responsible business conduct |
Sherritt has a Whistleblower Policy that indicates that any person submitting a reportable concern may choose to do so anonymously and confidentially through the Whistleblower Hotline maintained by the Corporation's designated external service provider. Reportable concerns may be submitted by any of the Corporation’s stakeholders including employees, contractors, directors, officers, vendors, and others. Mechanisms for individuals to seek advice on implementing the organization's policies and practices for responsible business conduct include accessing Investor Relations at investor@sherritt.com and/or through Sherritt's Whistleblower mechanism. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe the mechanisms for individuals to raise concerns about the organization’s business conduct |
Sherritt has a Whistleblower Policy and grievance mechanism that allow any person, anywhere in the value chain, to submit a reportable concern. The mechanism is confidential, independent, easily accessible to all community members, allows for anonymity and does not create internal conflict of interest or risk of retribution. The system maintained by the Corporation’s designated external service provider: 1. Online: https://www.clearviewconnects. com/home 2. Skype Audio Reporting: clearview-sherritt 3. Telephone: • Toll-free (North America): +1-866-840-8702 • Long distance: +1-416-386-5397 For concerns related to the Fort Site in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, please call +1-780- 992-7000. |
||||||||||||||
| Reportable Concerns | |||||||||||||||
| Ethics - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Compliance with laws and regulations | |||||||||||||||
| Report the total number of fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that were paid during the reporting period | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Total number of fines paid for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Total monetary value of fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that occurred in the current reporting period ($) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Describe the significant instances of non-compliance |
Does not apply. All operations are in compliance. |
||||||||||||||
| Ethics | |||||||||||||||
| Describe the management system and due diligence procedures for assessing and managing corruption and bribery risks internally and associated with business partners in its value chain |
Anti Corruption Policy Business Ethics Policy |
||||||||||||||
| Report net production from activities located in the countries with the 20 lowest rankings in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) (saleable tonnes, bbls, oz, lb, etc.) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Anti-Corruption - Sherritt | |||||||||||||||
| Communication and Training | |||||||||||||||
| Anti-corruption policies and procedures communication to direct employees by type: | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of the direct employees that have been communicated to on anti-corruption | 70 | ||||||||||||||
|
Anti-corruption policies and procedures communicated to 70 new employees in 2023. |
|||||||||||||||
| Anti-corruption policies and procedures communication to business partners/suppliers: | |||||||||||||||
| Other persons/organization to whom the anti-corruption policies have been communicated |
The policies and procedures have been communicated to the Board of Directors and individuals who perform work for Sherritt in previous reporting years. |
||||||||||||||
| Total number of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
Anti-corruption training not extended to governance body members in 2023. Anti- corruption training completed by 86% of governance body members in previous years. |
|||||||||||||||
| Total percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption, broken down by region | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Total number and percentage of direct employees that has received training on anti-corruption, broken down by employee category and region | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of direct employees that received training on anti-corruption | 59 | ||||||||||||||
|
Anti-corruption training provided to 59 new employees in 2023. |
|||||||||||||||
| Security Practices - Energas | |||||||||||||||
| Policy and Procedure Training | |||||||||||||||
| Report the percentage of security personnel (direct employees and workers who are not employees) who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Report on whether training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Security Practices - Fort Site | |||||||||||||||
| Policy and Procedure Training | |||||||||||||||
| Report the percentage of security personnel (direct employees and workers who are not employees) who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security | 91.6667% | ||||||||||||||
|
In 2022, the Fort Site secured a commitment from their security contractor to have consistent personnel on site and they are increasing training two-fold toward Sherritt's Human rights policies and commitment to the Voluntary Principles of Human Rights. |
|||||||||||||||
| Report on whether training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Security Practices - Moa Nickel | |||||||||||||||
| Policy and Procedure Training | |||||||||||||||
| Report the percentage of security personnel (direct employees and workers who are not employees) who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||||
| Report on whether training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Highest Review Position | |||||||||||||||
| Report whether the highest governance body is responsible for reviewing and approving the reported information, including the organization’s material topics, and if so, describe the process for reviewing and approving the information |
The Reserves Operations and Capital Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and approves all reported information, including the organization's material topics. The process involves reviewing all draft manuscripts and data, internal assurance measures, and regulated disclosure topics. Once approvals are secured by the ROC Committee, the COO completes a final approval in the information system. |
||||||||||||||
| Communication of critical concerns | |||||||||||||||
| Describe whether and how critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body |
Critical concerns are reported through quarterly reports. |
||||||||||||||
| Report the number of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Report the nature of critical concerns that were communicated to the highest governance body during the reporting period |
Not applicable. No critical concerns were communicated to the highest governance body. |
||||||||||||||
| Remuneration | |||||||||||||||
| Report which of the following remuneration policies apply to the highest governance body and senior executives: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed pay | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Variable pay | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Equity-based pay | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred and vested shares | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| Describe how the remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives relate to their objectives and performance in relation to the management of the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment and people |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| 2024 Management Information Circular | |||||||||||||||
| Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets |
No, and we do not plan to introduce them in the next two years |
||||||||||||||
| Describe the process for designing its remuneration policies and for determining remuneration |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| How the views of stakeholders (including shareholders) regarding remuneration are sought and taken into consideration |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe whether remuneration consultants are involved in determining remuneration and, if so, whether they are independent of the organization, its highest governance body and senior executives | Independent Consultants | ||||||||||||||
|
Independent consultants have no other relationship to the organization. |
|||||||||||||||
| Report the results of votes of stakeholders (including shareholders) on remuneration policies and proposals, if applicable |
Refer to Sherritt's 2024 Management Information Circular. |
||||||||||||||
| Stakeholder Engagement | |||||||||||||||
| Provide a list of stakeholder groups engaged by the organization | Other | ||||||||||||||
|
Government of Canada, Cuban Government, Cuban JV Partners, UNICEF Associations, Investment Community, International Finance Institutions, Insurers, Sustainability Rating Bodies, Local Community Organizations, Industry Associations, Employees, Contractors, Peers, Customers. |
|||||||||||||||
| Report the basis for identifying and selecting stakeholders with whom to engage |
The basis for identifying and selecting stakeholders with whom to engage includes dependency/interest and ability to influence. |
||||||||||||||
| Report the organization’s approach to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type |
Consultation on economic, environmental, and social topics is delegated to the most senior executive responsible for that function or activity. The resulting feedback is provided to the Board of Directors, as applicable and appropriate, in quarterly reports. |
||||||||||||||
| Anti-Competitive Behaviour | |||||||||||||||
| Legal Actions | |||||||||||||||
| Total number of legal actions pending or completed during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behaviour and violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation in which the organization has been identified as a participant: | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of legal actions pending during the reporting period regarding anti-competitive behaviour | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of legal actions completed during the reporting period regarding anti-trust behaviour | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Main outcomes of completed legal actions, including any decisions or judgments |
Does not apply. No legal actions completed during the reporting period. |
||||||||||||||
| Tax | |||||||||||||||
| Provide a description of the approach to tax, including | |||||||||||||||
| Does the organization have a tax strategy | Yes | ||||||||||||||
| The governance body or the executive level position within the organization that formally reviews and approves the tax strategy |
The Organization's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has overall responsibility for the oversight of the tax policy and operating principles. The CFO reports to the Audit Committee on the Organization's tax status on an annual basis or more frequently if necessary, including material tax issues and risks, reviews by tax authorities, and the overall tax strategy. |
||||||||||||||
| The frequency of formal review and approval of the tax strategy by the governance body or executive-level position within the organization | Annually | ||||||||||||||
| The approach to regulatory compliance |
a) To comply fully with all relevant laws and regulations, giving due consideration to the Corporation's reputation, brand and social responsibilities when considering tax initiatives. b) Where tax law is unclear or subject to interpretation, obtaining written advice or confirmation is considered to support the position adopted. c) Obtaining external advice or confirmation is considered where the financial impact is material to the Group. |
||||||||||||||
| How the approach to tax is linked to the business and sustainable development strategies of the organization |
Linkage with regulatory compliance, business ethics and community benefit contributions. |
||||||||||||||
| Provide a description of the tax governance and control framework, including | |||||||||||||||
| The governance body or executive-level position within the organization accountable for compliance with the tax strategy |
The Organization's CFO has overall responsibility for the oversight of the tax policy and operating principles. The governance body is the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. |
||||||||||||||
| How the approach to tax is embedded within the organization |
Considerable involvement of Organization's Tax Group in treasury, finance, legal and operational transactions. |
||||||||||||||
| The approach to tax risks, including how risks are identified, managed, and monitored |
a) Organization maintains a low threshold for tax risk and aims for certainty on tax positions it adopts. b) Ensures that all tax positions are supported by a strong risk assessment. |
||||||||||||||
| How compliance with the tax governance and control framework is evaluated |
The organization has an internal audit function that evaluates and formally reports to management and the Audit Committee on the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls as specified in the approved annual internal audit plan. Accordingly, external auditors are engaged to conduct annual reviews of the tax department’s compliance with the tax governance and control framework to evaluate performance of internal controls in all tax procedures and processes. |
||||||||||||||
| Provide a description of the mechanisms for reporting concerns about unethical or unlawful behaviour and the organization’s integrity in relation to tax |
Sherritt has a Whistleblower Policy and grievance mechanism that allows any person anywhere in the value chain to submit a reportable concern anonymously and confidentially through the system maintained by the Corporation's designated external service provider. Contact details for reporting any concerns are available at the link below. |
||||||||||||||
| Reportable Concerns | |||||||||||||||
| Provide a description of the assurance process for disclosures on tax and, if applicable, a reference to the assurance report, statement, or opinion |
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in National Instrument 52-109 of the Canadian Securities Commission (NI 52-109). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that all relevant information is gathered and reported to management, including the CEO and CFO, on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure. Management, with the participation of the certifying officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation, as of December 31, 2021, of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the certifying officers have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure that material information known by others relating to the Corporation and its subsidiaries is provided to them. |
||||||||||||||
| Describe the approach to stakeholder engagement and management of stakeholder concerns related to tax, including | |||||||||||||||
| The approach to engagement with tax authorities |
a) Undertake all dealings with tax authorities, government officials, ministers and other third parties in a professional, courteous and timely manner. b) Further, the tax function will aim to pro- actively manage the relationship with the tax authorities with the aim of minimizing the risk of challenge, dispute or damage to the Group’s reputation. Should a dispute arise with a tax authority as to how the Tax law should be interpreted and applied, the Corporation's objective is to resolve any issue promptly in a professional manner. The tax function should consider seeking external advice and/or opinions where the financial impact is material to the Group and/or there is the potential for reputational risk to the Corporation. |
||||||||||||||
| The approach to public policy advocacy on tax |
Completed through public disclosures including the 2023 MD&A. |
||||||||||||||
| 2023 MD&A | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| , Planet Earth's complete ESG reporting solution. | |||||||||||||||
